Topic

Service review insights for New York, United States, Restaurants

Detailed Service analysis for New York, United States, Restaurants.

This view focuses on Service signals in New York, United States, Restaurants to help you understand what guests mention most.

Use the linked insight articles to check examples, then prioritize one fix your team can execute this week.

Scope navigation

This topic view focuses on Restaurants in New York, United States. Compare with country-level data to decide if this is regional variation or a wider trend.

Key takeaway

Start with the largest deviation, confirm confidence, then move through the guided journey to execute quickly.

Current scope

New York, United States, Restaurants

Largest gap

Google Maps is above baseline by 0.1 points.

Confidence

27,724 reviews analyzed across 2 platforms.

Key Stats

Share of complaint snippets where this topic appears by platform.

This metric tracks topic presence in complaint snippets, not positive versus negative sentiment split.

Balance is praise minus complaint for this topic on the same platform.

Google Maps
Signal balance: +25.8pp

Complaint signal

7.3%

Praise signal

33.1%

Tripadvisor
Signal balance: +43.4pp

Complaint signal

10.6%

Praise signal

54.0%

Comparison

Compare this region with country-level Restaurants patterns.

Google Maps

Country baseline

7.3%

Tripadvisor

Country baseline

10.6%

Context

Coverage

4 insight pages mention Service in this scope.

Signal strength

Complaint signal is 9.0% across available platforms.

Praise signal is 43.5% across available platforms.

Next step

Use these topic signals to prioritize one operational change, then check fresh reviews to confirm impact.

Compare New York, United States against national Restaurants patterns to identify where local execution diverges.

Service patterns usually point to operational choices that directly affect conversion and repeat visits for Restaurants.

Scope signal summary

This section summarizes current complaint and praise signals for the selected scope and compares them to the available baseline.

Tripadvisor

Complaint signal is 10.6%.

Praise signal is 54.0%.

Baseline signal is 10.6%.

Delta vs baseline is 0.0 points.

Google Maps

Complaint signal is 7.3%.

Praise signal is 33.1%.

Baseline signal is 7.3%.

Delta vs baseline is 0.1 points.

Top recurring drivers

These are the strongest recurring drivers behind this topic in the current scope.

Google Maps

Top complaints

  • "Not worth $1,000 for two people. The food was underwhelming—overly salty, sour, and too sweet. The staff was unprofessional, which was surprising for a Michelin-starred restaurant. This was the first time I’ve experienced such poor service at this level. I don’t drink alcohol or enjoy mocktails, so I simply asked if they had a mocktail list (not a pairing menu). The server said no and didn’t offer a beverage menu. Only later did I discover they had a tea selection, but I had to ask for the menu myself. It felt like she didn’t know how to properly handle guests. The chefs were serving dishes, and one of them seemed visibly angry. While I don’t expect excessive friendliness, his demeanor was unsettling. Overall, I didn’t enjoy the meal and am genuinely surprised this restaurant holds two Michelin stars. (0.0%)
  • $12 for a Tito's and soda. Insulting is an understatement. Heard lots of great things about this place, but I have no idea what they were talking about. The place is small, with uncomfortable chairs and way overpriced drinks. The menu is pathetically small and overpriced. Additionally they had a "security guard" at the door, which was very off putting. Never ever going to spend another penny here. Move on to places that actually care (0.0%)
  • $21 on 8 small, quarter size sushi pieces. The fish is bloody, tough, and low quality. Leaves look yellowed and inedible, plating inevitably looked empty. Taste was bland and uninspired. Service was not great, felt as if I was being rushed out despite being the only customer in the whole restaurant. Pretty restaurant though. (0.0%)

Top praises

  • Great food and service (0.0%)
  • Great experience! Friendly staff and a very cozy vibe (0.0%)
  • Great food and service! (0.0%)

Tripadvisor

Top complaints

  • "Are we at Per Se or are we at Applebee's?" This was the question on our minds as we ate dinner. Buyer beware - do not come to Per Se if you are expecting a refined and elegant dining experience. Per Se has no expected standards of attire and behavior being enforced confirmed by its own maitre d Alex Pimentel. This failure of the purported three Michelin star institution greatly reduced the quality and enjoyment of our experience and was far below what we have experienced in the past at Per Se or other three Michelin star restaurants. One table in our direct view had two very old men with two teenaged-looking girls. One girl was wearing sweatpants, a crop top, and flip flops. The other girl was wearing a sweatshirt and sneakers. One of the old men had a little black puppy with him and Per Se allowed the puppy to run around the floor of the dining room throughout the dinner. Another table next to us was obnoxiously loud throughout the evening, taking over the space and taking away from everyone else's enjoyment. It was clear from the circus around us that Per Se has no standards for guest attire or behavior and does not care about guest experience at all. When I wrote to the restaurant after our dinner to share our feedback, the maitre d Alex Pimentel asked me to call him to talk. After playing phone tag a couple times, we were finally able to connect. Alex began the phone conversation by flippantly stating "I understand you had a problem with some guests who weren't dressed as nicely as you would have liked?" Wow. This is the guy they put in charge of guest relations? What a great attitude for the job. Alex ended up wasting 20 minutes of my time by making up excuses for every single aspect of our underwhelming dining experience. According to Alex: 1) Per Se does not have a dress code for women, only for men. Women can apparently dine in a string bikini and flip flops. Alex says: "Per Se gets people from all walks of life and unfortunately we really only enforce a dress code for men." 2) Alex said the old men were hotel guests and that they were dining with their "nieces or daughters." I told him that we could not care less where the old men were lodging or the nature of their relationship with the teenaged girls, but that the young women should at the very least not be wearing sweatpants, crop tops, flip flops, sweatshirts, and sneakers. Alex once again reiterated that there is no dress code for women. 3) Alex could not come up with an excuse for the puppy running around. 4) Alex said that if we were disappointed at any point in the evening with our experience, the burden was on us to try to create the experience we want. Alex said we should have complained about the other guests (all seated within earshot) and we may have been reseated space permitting. So a three Michelin star restaurant is putting the onus on its guests to create a fine dining experience. Why would it be on guests to make sure Per Se enforces basic standards of attire and behavior of other guests? When Per Se allows a circus in its dining room, Per Se is not going after a three Michelin star experience. When the maitre d tells guests that it is actually their burden and responsibility to create a pleasant and enjoyable experience, there is something terribly wrong with the training and culture at Per Se. 5) Food: lobster was extremely chewy like bubblegum. The chicken was bland and a bit rubbery. Loved the crispy skin on the bass. Lamb was just lamb, but on the tougher side. The wagyu was unremarkable. Black truffle pasta was delicious with a generous shaving of truffles. 6) Service: star is for Maris who was fantastic and we appreciated her excellent service and professionalism. Maris seemed to be the only one we encountered at Per Se who was aware that the restaurant is supposed to provide a three Michelin star experience. The wine pairing was $350 and the sommelier was perfunctory and inattentive. Alex concluded our phone conversation with an underwhelming, "well in the future please reach out to me to coordinate your next visit to Per Se." He didn't even offer a genuine apology without excuses or any gesture of good will from the restaurant. Will we be coming back to Per Se after this experience and Alex's response to our feedback? As Randy Jackson once eloquently stated, "Yeah that's gonna be a no from me, dawg." (0.0%)
  • "Great once we got our table. One tip - if you’re asking people to wait for their table don’t stick them in a corridor where they’re in the way and can’t get a drink. It’s not the fault of paying customers that they’re on time but you’re not!" (0.0%)
  • $ 9.99 for 5 cheese sticks tasted like they were frozen. We went with a groupon and were treated second class. Was told the Groupon would only cover dinner items ( Groupon said anything on the menu ) Would not give us the salads that came with the dinner items. And the sauces were not as good a Olive Garden and I don't consider Olive Garden a good example of Italian food. The back room was much better looking than the garish front. So, I thought the value was poor, the service somewhat hostile and the food mediocre. Would never go back (0.0%)

Top praises

  • Great food, wine and service! (0.0%)
  • The steak and the service were first class, as you might expect, but (and I'm sorry for the levels of pretentiousness on this one) the octopus starter was overcooked and rubbery. Didn't detract from a fantastic meal, it was just disappointing when you don't see it on menu's too often. Great views of the city and would recommend. (0.0%)
  • "Are we at Per Se or are we at Applebee's?" This was the question on our minds as we ate dinner. Buyer beware - do not come to Per Se if you are expecting a refined and elegant dining experience. Per Se has no expected standards of attire and behavior being enforced confirmed by its own maitre d Alex Pimentel. This failure of the purported three Michelin star institution greatly reduced the quality and enjoyment of our experience and was far below what we have experienced in the past at Per Se or other three Michelin star restaurants. One table in our direct view had two very old men with two teenaged-looking girls. One girl was wearing sweatpants, a crop top, and flip flops. The other girl was wearing a sweatshirt and sneakers. One of the old men had a little black puppy with him and Per Se allowed the puppy to run around the floor of the dining room throughout the dinner. Another table next to us was obnoxiously loud throughout the evening, taking over the space and taking away from everyone else's enjoyment. It was clear from the circus around us that Per Se has no standards for guest attire or behavior and does not care about guest experience at all. When I wrote to the restaurant after our dinner to share our feedback, the maitre d Alex Pimentel asked me to call him to talk. After playing phone tag a couple times, we were finally able to connect. Alex began the phone conversation by flippantly stating "I understand you had a problem with some guests who weren't dressed as nicely as you would have liked?" Wow. This is the guy they put in charge of guest relations? What a great attitude for the job. Alex ended up wasting 20 minutes of my time by making up excuses for every single aspect of our underwhelming dining experience. According to Alex: 1) Per Se does not have a dress code for women, only for men. Women can apparently dine in a string bikini and flip flops. Alex says: "Per Se gets people from all walks of life and unfortunately we really only enforce a dress code for men." 2) Alex said the old men were hotel guests and that they were dining with their "nieces or daughters." I told him that we could not care less where the old men were lodging or the nature of their relationship with the teenaged girls, but that the young women should at the very least not be wearing sweatpants, crop tops, flip flops, sweatshirts, and sneakers. Alex once again reiterated that there is no dress code for women. 3) Alex could not come up with an excuse for the puppy running around. 4) Alex said that if we were disappointed at any point in the evening with our experience, the burden was on us to try to create the experience we want. Alex said we should have complained about the other guests (all seated within earshot) and we may have been reseated space permitting. So a three Michelin star restaurant is putting the onus on its guests to create a fine dining experience. Why would it be on guests to make sure Per Se enforces basic standards of attire and behavior of other guests? When Per Se allows a circus in its dining room, Per Se is not going after a three Michelin star experience. When the maitre d tells guests that it is actually their burden and responsibility to create a pleasant and enjoyable experience, there is something terribly wrong with the training and culture at Per Se. 5) Food: lobster was extremely chewy like bubblegum. The chicken was bland and a bit rubbery. Loved the crispy skin on the bass. Lamb was just lamb, but on the tougher side. The wagyu was unremarkable. Black truffle pasta was delicious with a generous shaving of truffles. 6) Service: star is for Maris who was fantastic and we appreciated her excellent service and professionalism. Maris seemed to be the only one we encountered at Per Se who was aware that the restaurant is supposed to provide a three Michelin star experience. The wine pairing was $350 and the sommelier was perfunctory and inattentive. Alex concluded our phone conversation with an underwhelming, "well in the future please reach out to me to coordinate your next visit to Per Se." He didn't even offer a genuine apology without excuses or any gesture of good will from the restaurant. Will we be coming back to Per Se after this experience and Alex's response to our feedback? As Randy Jackson once eloquently stated, "Yeah that's gonna be a no from me, dawg." (0.0%)

Representative review quotes

Representative review excerpts add operational context to the topic signals.

Google Maps · Complaint quote

"I feel sorry for the few employees working at this store. They work very hard, but on busy days, the food doesn't come out on time. How is it possible that I have to waste my lunch break waiting for a meal? I waited for over 40 minutes, and no one was willing to give me a refund—and they hadn't even started making the food yet. It happened to me twice. I trusted you. Thanks for making me waste my lunch break and my time. Now I got go back to work with hungry!"

Review rating: 1.0

Google Maps · Praise quote

"Very good food, top notch service."

Review rating: 4.0

Tripadvisor · Complaint quote

"Experience in a 2-star restaurant in New York – Dinner on March 15 We dined at this 2-star restaurant on Sunday evening, March 15, on the occasion of our wedding anniversary. As soon as we arrived, we were surprised by the very cold temperature of the room: the air conditioning was on in the middle of winter, which made the moment uncomfortable. Unfortunately, the service fell far short of what you would expect from a 2-star hotel. Indeed, the Rank Chief left the room mid-duty; we were told that this was due to the excessive cost of keeping all staff in the room all evening — a very surprising situation in this type of facility. Moreover, at no time during the meal did anyone come to ensure that everything was going well at our table. As for the course of the dinner, we felt as if we were being pushed towards the exit: from the pre-dessert, a waiter started tidying up the room, which created some discomfort. At the time of payment, we were accompanied by a very kind young woman, speaking perfectly French, to whom we shared our comments. However, the manager present at his side had no word towards us, which we perceived as contempt. In terms of hygiene and details: • The truffle service on the risotto shocked us: the waiter handled the truffle for several tables without gloves. It is essential to serve the truffle with gloves, which has not been respected here. • The toilets were dirty and a lamp was missing, making the lighting insufficient. Another disappointing point: no nice dishes to accompany the dishes (except the dish around the egg). Always the same cutlery, pretty low-end. However, dishes are fully part of the gastronomic experience expected at this level. Regarding the attention paid to our special occasion, my husband had asked when booking a rose to mark our wedding anniversary. He was denied this, but a hand-drawn card had been placed on the table, a gesture we appreciated. Finally, it is important to note that the dinner itself was good, despite the numerous service deficiencies. Conclusion: An overall disappointing experience due to a service clearly not up to the standards of a 2-star restaurant, despite quality cuisine."

Review rating: 4.0

Tripadvisor · Praise quote

"We sat upstairs, which we preferred as it’s quieter. Daniel, or server, was warm, engaging, helpful and efficient. The food quality was excellent. This visit exceeded our expectations."

Review rating: 5.0

Evidence from source analysis

These snippets come from aggregated analysis text and highlight recurring language tied to this topic.

Google Maps Complaint signal
""Not worth $1,000 for two people. The food was underwhelming—overly salty, sour, and too sweet. The staff was unprofessional, which was surprising for a Michelin-starred restaurant. This was the first time I’ve experienced such poor service at this level. I don’t drink alcohol or enjoy mocktails, so I simply asked if they had a mocktail list (not a pairing menu). The server said no and didn’t offer a beverage menu. Only later did I discover they had a tea selection, but I had to ask for the menu myself. It felt like she didn’t know how to properly handle guests. The chefs were serving dishes, and one of them seemed visibly angry. While I don’t expect excessive friendliness, his demeanor was unsettling. Overall, I didn’t enjoy the meal and am genuinely surprised this restaurant holds two Michelin stars."

Signal: 0.0%

Google Maps Complaint signal
"$12 for a Tito's and soda. Insulting is an understatement. Heard lots of great things about this place, but I have no idea what they were talking about. The place is small, with uncomfortable chairs and way overpriced drinks. The menu is pathetically small and overpriced. Additionally they had a "security guard" at the door, which was very off putting. Never ever going to spend another penny here. Move on to places that actually care"

Signal: 0.0%

Google Maps Complaint signal
"$21 on 8 small, quarter size sushi pieces. The fish is bloody, tough, and low quality. Leaves look yellowed and inedible, plating inevitably looked empty. Taste was bland and uninspired. Service was not great, felt as if I was being rushed out despite being the only customer in the whole restaurant. Pretty restaurant though."

Signal: 0.0%

Google Maps Praise signal
"Great food and service"

Signal: 0.0%

Google Maps Praise signal
"Great experience! Friendly staff and a very cozy vibe"

Signal: 0.0%

Google Maps Praise signal
"Great food and service!"

Signal: 0.0%

Interpretation

This interpretation highlights the largest deviations from the selected baseline so teams can prioritize faster.

Google Maps

0.1pp above

Current signal is above baseline by 0.1 points (current 7.3%, baseline 7.3%).

Tripadvisor

0.0pp above

Current signal is above baseline by 0.0 points (current 10.6%, baseline 10.6%).

Quality and confidence

Check coverage and freshness before treating differences as operational priorities.

Reviews analyzed

27,724

Collected reviews: 422,360 · Analysis coverage: 6.6%

Platforms covered

2

Last update

March 31, 2026

Guided journey

Move through these pages in order to validate findings and choose the next operational action.

Role-based actions

Assign one owner per role so this topic moves from insight to action without ambiguity.

Business owner

Set one measurable target for this topic and review progress at fixed monthly checkpoints.

Operations manager

Define one process fix tied to this topic and review frontline adherence weekly.

Marketing lead

Align guest communication with your strongest signals, and address weak themes before promotional pushes.

Why this differs from generic dashboards

Reviato emphasizes actionable comparisons over vanity averages so teams can execute with confidence.

Cross-platform discipline

We preserve platform context and compare like-with-like to avoid mixing structurally different review behaviors.

Validation workflow

Every insight should be validated in linked articles and source pages before operational rollout.

FAQ

Related insights

Review source articles behind this topic before choosing the next action.

About this analysis

This topic page shows the editorial owner, current evidence volume, and the latest aggregated refresh for the selected scope.

Role
Review Intelligence Editorial Team
Last updated
March 31, 2026
Market scope
New York, United States, Restaurants
Review texts analyzed
27,724
Platforms included
2

Continue through this market

Use these links to validate the topic page against adjacent scope pages and the core methodology documents.

Editorial ownership

Reviato Insights Team

Review Intelligence Editorial Team

Reviato's insights team publishes review intelligence built from public platform data, market-level aggregation, and documented analysis standards.