What the reviews show
Positive cleanliness mentions appeared in 2.04 percent of analyzed Tripadvisor reviews and 1.65 percent of analyzed Google Maps reviews. That is a gap of 0.38 points, computed from exact counts before rounding. These are unmatched review samples, so the gap does not rank the platforms or establish a cause.
The practical question: Which cleanliness praise shows up in recent Tripadvisor reviews, and what should a business protect?
- Cleanliness praise: 256 reviews across 94 businesses.
- One review described the experience this way: “The restaurant was clean and fresh looking, the service was good and the food was delicious.”
Evidence
Cleanliness evidence
Tripadvisor reviews show how this topic splits between complaints and praise. Figures reflect current listings and reviews and can differ from the frozen analyzed sample cited in the article text.
- Complaint share
- 0.58%
-
- 73 of 12,574 analyzed reviews mention this · complaint mentions across 45 locations · 95% interval 0.5–0.7%
- Praise share
- 2.04%
-
- 256 of 12,574 analyzed reviews mention this · praise mentions across 94 locations · 95% interval 1.8–2.3%
Bars scaled 0–5%; exact shares in labels.
- Food
- 84.12%
-
- Service
- 69.15%
-
- Atmosphere
- 21.71%
-
- Value
- 18.23%
-
- Cleanliness
- 2.04%
-
Bars scaled 0–100%; exact shares in labels.
- Complaint share
- 0.6%
- Praise share
- 2%
- Reviews analyzed
- 12,574
- Locations with complaint mentions
- 45
- Locations with praise mentions
- 94
Why this matters to an operator
The market figures are a benchmark, not a diagnosis. Compare recent cleanliness mentions by location and period; a local cluster is more useful than the market percentage when deciding where to investigate.
What to compare in your reviews
Start with recent cleanliness mentions in your own reviews. Compare positive and negative experiences by business and period before changing procedures.
- Which cleanliness details recur in your own recent reviews?
- Do cleanliness reviews cluster by location or period in your own reviews?
- Compare your cleanliness pattern with the market baseline before changing operations.
Confidence and limits
These figures describe unmatched platform samples, not every business in the market. Use them as context, then confirm any local concern with recent reviews and operating records.
- Google Maps and Tripadvisor may attract different reviewers and cover different sets of restaurants in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- Reviews describe guest experiences; they do not establish what caused them.
- The pattern will not apply to every restaurant in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
- Numbers in the article text describe the frozen analysis sample; market-context cards elsewhere on this page update separately.
Coverage and recency
The topic comparison uses 12,574 distinct analyzed Tripadvisor reviews across 119 businesses in the analyzed sample from 2013-02-08 through 2026-07-31, with the Google Maps sample as descriptive context. Per-platform collected totals live in the evidence snapshot on this page.
Evidence
Evidence snapshot
The full Tripadvisor listing inventory and review archive behind this article. Dated spans here can differ from the analyzed sample because inventory and analysis cover different populations; figures in the article text cite the analyzed sample and its own dates.
- 5-star
- 67.06%
-
- 8,441 reviews
- 4-star
- 17.57%
-
- 2,212 reviews
- 3-star
- 6.91%
-
- 870 reviews
- 2-star
- 4.0%
-
- 504 reviews
- 1-star
- 4.46%
-
- 561 reviews
Bars scaled 0–100%; exact shares in labels.
- Vancouver
- 4.34
-
- British Columbia (province)
- 4.34
-
- Canada
- 4.32
-
Bars scaled 0–5; exact shares in labels.
- Listing records
- 120
- Published reviews
- 90,980
- Collected reviews
- 12,588
- Reviews with ratings
- 12,588
- Average rating
- 4.34
- Review period
- January 04, 2008 to July 31, 2026