Miami Hotels snapshot: 80 analyzed locations, 138,656 published reviews, and a reported average rating of 4.11.
A bounded view of Miami hotel feedback
Evidence
Evidence snapshot
The article uses this Google Maps dataset scope before interpreting review themes.
- Locations
- 80
- Published reviews
- 138,656
- Reviews analyzed
- 5,226
- Average rating
- 4.11
This snapshot covers 80 analyzed hotel locations in Miami, alongside 138,656 published reviews and a reported average rating of 4.11. These figures establish the breadth and overall rating context of the collection. They should be read as a defined snapshot of one locality rather than a claim about every hotel or guest experience in the market.
Evidence:
- Snapshot: analyzed locations: 80; published reviews: 138,656; reported average rating: 4.11; localities count: 1
Room feedback as a defined theme
Evidence
Room evidence
Google Maps reviews show how this topic splits between complaints and praise.
- Complaint share
- 21.76
- Praise share
- 37.26
- Complaint share
- 21.8%
- Praise share
- 37.3%
- Reviews analyzed
- 5,226
Clean rooms.
If you ever been to jail or military then this will bring back memories NOT TRULY A HOSTEL more like a flop house in the 80s not cooking areas not even outside but it is a safe-ish enough environment 25$ for a bunk bed and that's pretty much it check your s...
Room-related feedback forms a defined part of the analyzed review material, establishing guest rooms as a subject without identifying the attributes discussed or the views expressed. The available evidence does not include a room-specific illustrative comment, so the underlying comments would need to be examined to understand what guests said about their rooms.
Evidence:
- Room: percentage: 21.76%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 37.26%; sample reviews analyzed: 5,226
A concrete concern about cleaning service
Evidence
Service evidence
Google Maps reviews show how this topic splits between complaints and praise.
- Complaint share
- 16.86
- Praise share
- 40.28
- Complaint share
- 16.9%
- Praise share
- 40.3%
- Reviews analyzed
- 5,226
Excellent service.
Filed a police report, opened a corporate claim, and was promised a response from risk management within 3 business days.
Service-related feedback includes an illustrative complaint about the cleaning staff’s work. The guest described old stains on the floors and walls, along with floors that had not been vacuumed. This comment provides a concrete negative example of service-related cleanliness handling, but does not establish that the concern appeared elsewhere.
Evidence:
- Service: percentage: 16.86%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 40.28%; sample reviews analyzed: 5,226
- Illustrative service comment: You can tell their cleaning staff is not doing a good job because there was plenty of old stains on the floors and walls that had obviously been there for a while and the floors hadn’t been vacuumed.
Location within the review material
Evidence
Location evidence
Google Maps reviews show how this topic splits between complaints and praise.
- Complaint share
- 8.82
- Praise share
- 29.85
- Complaint share
- 8.8%
- Praise share
- 29.9%
- Reviews analyzed
- 5,226
Great location.
If you ever been to jail or military then this will bring back memories NOT TRULY A HOSTEL more like a flop house in the 80s not cooking areas not even outside but it is a safe-ish enough environment 25$ for a bunk bed and that's pretty much it check your s...
Location is identified as a distinct subject in the analyzed review material, but the available topic evidence does not specify which place-related details guests discussed or how they assessed them. Examining the underlying comments could clarify what location-specific content guests contributed without presuming that access, surroundings, convenience, or any other particular attribute was involved.
Evidence:
- Location: percentage: 8.82%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 29.85%; sample reviews analyzed: 5,226