Las Vegas Hotels snapshot: 209 analyzed locations, 2,386,342 published reviews, and a reported average rating of 4.02.
A large published-review snapshot, narrowly framed
Evidence
Evidence snapshot
The article uses this Aggregate dataset scope before interpreting review themes.
- Locations
- 209
- Published reviews
- 2,386,342
- Reviews analyzed
- 13,112
- Average rating
- 4.02
This Las Vegas hotel snapshot places a reported average rating of 4.02 alongside 2,386,342 published reviews across 209 analyzed locations. All locations fall within one locality, so the figures offer a bounded view of the specified hotel market. They do not describe Nevada hospitality more broadly or show how results may vary over time.
Evidence:
- Snapshot: analyzed locations: 209; published reviews: 2,386,342; reported average rating: 4.02; localities count: 1
Room feedback can focus on a single tangible detail
Evidence
Platform comparison
Compare platform-level rating and review volume before treating one channel as the full market.
- Google Maps
- 4.02
- Tripadvisor
- 4.01
- Google Maps
- 4.02 rating · 13,040 avg reviews
- Tripadvisor
- 4.01 rating · 8,318 avg reviews
One room comment describes a guest discovering a red bug crawling on the bed after one night. The account illustrates the specificity of room-related language by identifying what was seen and where. It remains one guest’s experience and does not establish how often similar observations appeared elsewhere in the review material.
Evidence:
- Room: percentage: 21.07%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 49.29%; sample reviews analyzed: 13,112
- Illustrative room comment: After spending one night there, I discovered a red bug crawling on my bed.
Service is described through the guest’s interaction
The illustrative service comment connects attentive staff with the guest feeling at home throughout the visit. Its wording shows how service feedback may combine an observable staff quality with a personal reaction. It still represents only one account and does not establish a broader pattern among the hotels or reviews examined.
Evidence:
- Service: percentage: 16.92%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 43.81%; sample reviews analyzed: 13,112
- Illustrative service comment: The service was a highlight—the staff was attentive and made me feel right at home throughout my visit.
Location is present, but the example addresses atmosphere
Location appears as a topic in the review analysis, yet the illustrative comment describes modern luxury and a relaxed, welcoming atmosphere rather than access, surroundings, or proximity. Because that language does not literally support a location interpretation, the bounded takeaway is simply that location was identified as a review theme; no more specific reading is warranted here.
Evidence:
- Location: percentage: 8.72%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 32.68%; sample reviews analyzed: 13,112