Philadelphia hotels on Google Maps and TripAdvisor

Philadelphia Hotels snapshot: 204 analyzed locations, 568,142 published reviews, and a reported average rating of 4.23.

The snapshot in context

The snapshot covers 204 analyzed locations, alongside 568,142 published reviews and a reported average rating of 4.23. These figures establish the breadth of the collected material without showing how individual properties differ. Because the coverage spans one locality, the findings should be read within that geographic boundary.

Evidence:

• Snapshot: analyzed locations: 204; published reviews: 568,142; reported average rating: 4.23; localities count: 1

Room feedback can hinge on specific sleeping surfaces

A stained sofa-bed mattress and badly stained pillows are the concrete room details in this guest account. The wording keeps the concern focused on the condition of the additional sleeping arrangement and its bedding. As one illustrative comment, it shows how a guest described that room, not how often comparable concerns appeared.

Evidence:

• Room: percentage: 18.07%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 55.65%; sample reviews analyzed: 20,560
• Illustrative room comment: Our room came with a sofa bed and the pillows are badly stained and the sofa bed mattress is also stained.

Front-desk interactions shape service language

The service comment centers on a named front-desk employee whom the guest describes as extremely rude. Its directness shows that service feedback may identify both the interaction point and the individual involved. This single account conveys one guest’s judgment, without explaining the exchange or establishing a broader pattern.

Evidence:

• Service: percentage: 13.97%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 57.69%; sample reviews analyzed: 20,560
• Illustrative service comment: Colleen is extremely rude and shouldn’t work at the front desk .

Location comments may describe nearby reference points

This location account describes a short walk from several hotels and identifies the guest’s lodging near Broad Street and Locust Street. Its practical detail is proximity and orientation rather than an assessment of the destination itself. The comment illustrates one guest’s geographic framing, without establishing convenience for other travelers or journeys.

Evidence:

• Location: percentage: 7.39%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 46.65%; sample reviews analyzed: 20,560
• Illustrative location comment: A short walk from multiple hotels; we stayed at the DoubleTree right off Broad St and Locust.