Philadelphia Hotels snapshot: 117 analyzed locations, 447,985 published reviews, and a reported average rating of 4.24.

The Philadelphia hotel snapshot

Evidence

Evidence snapshot

The article uses this TripAdvisor dataset scope before interpreting review themes.

Locations
117
Published reviews
447,985
Reviews analyzed
14,561
Average rating
4.24

This Philadelphia snapshot covers 117 analyzed hotel locations, with 447,985 published reviews alongside a reported average rating of 4.24. It offers a bounded view of one locality within Pennsylvania, so the figures describe the included locations and review volume without establishing broader patterns across the state.

Evidence:

  • Snapshot: analyzed locations: 117; published reviews: 447,985; reported average rating: 4.24; localities count: 1

Room feedback becomes concrete

Evidence

Room evidence

TripAdvisor reviews show how this topic splits between complaints and praise.

Topic share
Complaint share
17.25
Praise share
58.97
Complaint share
17.3%
Praise share
59%
Reviews analyzed
14,561
Praise example
Very clean.
Complaint example
Dirty room

The illustrative room comment focuses on two tangible aspects of the stay: water pressure and room cleanliness. Its phrasing suggests that both were basic expectations for this particular reviewer, while offering no detail about the specific cleanliness issue or what happened with the water pressure.

Evidence:

  • Room: percentage: 17.25%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 58.97%; sample reviews analyzed: 14,561
  • Illustrative room comment: At least we could have had water pressure and a clean room.

Uncertainty shapes the service account

Evidence

Service evidence

TripAdvisor reviews show how this topic splits between complaints and praise.

Topic share
Complaint share
13.06
Praise share
64.08
Complaint share
13.1%
Praise share
64.1%
Reviews analyzed
14,561
Praise example
Friendly staff.
Complaint example
Poor customer service

The illustrative service comment describes a guest explaining a situation to staff but remaining unsure whether a charge was removed. The account centers on unresolved communication and the guest’s stated stress and frustration, without clarifying the original charge, the staff’s response, or the final outcome.

Evidence:

  • Service: percentage: 13.06%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 64.08%; sample reviews analyzed: 14,561
  • Illustrative service comment: I explained the situation to the staff, and I’m not sure whether the charge was ultimately removed, but it was quite stressful and frustrating.

Location framed through walkability

Evidence

Location evidence

TripAdvisor reviews show how this topic splits between complaints and praise.

Topic share
Complaint share
6.72
Praise share
49.41
Complaint share
6.7%
Praise share
49.4%
Reviews analyzed
14,561
Praise example
Great location.
Complaint example
$230/night for a basic 2 queen room (filled with mold), $25/day for parking (not included w/ stay, littered with trash), $30/person for the waterpark (more like a zoo - ape exhibit extends into the hotel lobby).

The illustrative location comment connects convenience with being able to reach most tourist attractions on foot. That makes walkability the specific feature behind this guest’s positive description, although the account does not identify the attractions, distances involved, or the hotel’s precise position within Philadelphia.

Evidence:

  • Location: percentage: 6.72%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 49.41%; sample reviews analyzed: 14,561
  • Illustrative location comment: The hotel is very conveniently located, and you can visit most tourist attractions within walking distance.