Kansas City Hotels snapshot: 159 analyzed locations, 128,777 published reviews, and a reported average rating of 3.98.

A bounded Kansas City hotel snapshot

Evidence

Evidence snapshot

The article uses this Aggregate dataset scope before interpreting review themes.

Locations
159
Published reviews
128,777
Reviews analyzed
13,237
Average rating
3.98

The Kansas City snapshot places a reported average rating of 3.98 alongside 128,777 published reviews across 159 analyzed locations. Those figures describe one locality and should be read as a defined view of Missouri hotels in Kansas City, rather than as a picture of hotel performance elsewhere in the state.

Evidence:

  • Snapshot: analyzed locations: 159; published reviews: 128,777; reported average rating: 3.98; localities count: 1

Comfort and in-room features in one guest account

Evidence

Platform comparison

Compare platform-level rating and review volume before treating one channel as the full market.

Average rating
Google Maps
4.19
Tripadvisor
3.87
Google Maps
4.19 rating · 1,323 avg reviews
Tripadvisor
3.87 rating · 531 avg reviews

One room comment focuses on three tangible details: pillows described as small and flat, sound audible from neighboring rooms, and the absence of a mini fridge. The account is useful for understanding the specific language a guest used when discussing bedding, room-to-room noise, and an expected in-room feature, without establishing how often others shared those concerns.

Evidence:

  • Room: percentage: 22.83%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 53.1%; sample reviews analyzed: 13,237
  • Illustrative room comment: Cons: the pillows are so small and flat, you can hear the neighboring rooms, and there aren’t not mini fridges in the room.

A front-door interaction shapes the service comment

The illustrative service account pairs appreciation for a downtown Kansas City setting with a negative description of the staff at the front door. Its service relevance is therefore narrow and specific: the guest characterized one arrival-area interaction as rude. The comment does not describe other staff members, later encounters, or the hotel’s service more broadly.

Evidence:

  • Service: percentage: 16.48%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 48.7%; sample reviews analyzed: 13,237
  • Illustrative service comment: Right in the heart of down town kansas city which is cool but the staff at the front door were rude.

Location expressed as a concise positive

The location comment offers a brief positive assessment, linking a favorable view of the setting with amenities. Because the guest supplied no landmarks, neighborhood details, or travel purpose, the account cannot clarify what made the location appealing. It instead shows the compact language one reviewer used to praise both place and available features.

Evidence:

  • Location: percentage: 10.6%; reported praise percentage (denominator not supplied): 35.14%; sample reviews analyzed: 13,237
  • Illustrative location comment: Great location and amenities.