Current scope
New York, United States
Topic
Detailed Wait Time analysis for New York, United States.
This view focuses on Wait Time signals in New York, United States to help you understand what guests mention most.
Use the linked insight articles to check examples, then prioritize one fix your team can execute this week.
This topic view covers multiple categories in United States. Narrow by category when you need operationally specific comparisons.
Start with the largest deviation, confirm confidence, then move through the guided journey to execute quickly.
Current scope
New York, United States
Largest gap
Baseline comparison is not available for this scope yet.
Confidence
9,623 reviews analyzed across 1 platforms.
Share of complaint snippets where this topic appears by platform.
This metric tracks topic presence in complaint snippets, not positive versus negative sentiment split.
Balance is praise minus complaint for this topic on the same platform.
Complaint signal
5.8%
Praise signal
12.4%
Coverage
10 insight pages mention Wait Time in this scope.
Signal strength
Complaint signal is 5.8% across available platforms.
Praise signal is 12.4% across available platforms.
Next step
Use these topic signals to prioritize one operational change, then check fresh reviews to confirm impact.
Use this global view as a baseline before drilling into country, region, or city-level topic patterns.
Wait Time patterns usually point to operational choices that directly affect conversion and repeat visits for local businesses.
This section summarizes current complaint and praise signals for the selected scope and compares them to the available baseline.
Tripadvisor
Complaint signal is 5.8%.
Praise signal is 12.4%.
These are the strongest recurring drivers behind this topic in the current scope.
Tripadvisor
Representative review excerpts add operational context to the topic signals.
Tripadvisor · Complaint quote
"Experience in a 2-star restaurant in New York – Dinner on March 15 We dined at this 2-star restaurant on Sunday evening, March 15, on the occasion of our wedding anniversary. As soon as we arrived, we were surprised by the very cold temperature of the room: the air conditioning was on in the middle of winter, which made the moment uncomfortable. Unfortunately, the service fell far short of what you would expect from a 2-star hotel. Indeed, the Rank Chief left the room mid-duty; we were told that this was due to the excessive cost of keeping all staff in the room all evening — a very surprising situation in this type of facility. Moreover, at no time during the meal did anyone come to ensure that everything was going well at our table. As for the course of the dinner, we felt as if we were being pushed towards the exit: from the pre-dessert, a waiter started tidying up the room, which created some discomfort. At the time of payment, we were accompanied by a very kind young woman, speaking perfectly French, to whom we shared our comments. However, the manager present at his side had no word towards us, which we perceived as contempt. In terms of hygiene and details: • The truffle service on the risotto shocked us: the waiter handled the truffle for several tables without gloves. It is essential to serve the truffle with gloves, which has not been respected here. • The toilets were dirty and a lamp was missing, making the lighting insufficient. Another disappointing point: no nice dishes to accompany the dishes (except the dish around the egg). Always the same cutlery, pretty low-end. However, dishes are fully part of the gastronomic experience expected at this level. Regarding the attention paid to our special occasion, my husband had asked when booking a rose to mark our wedding anniversary. He was denied this, but a hand-drawn card had been placed on the table, a gesture we appreciated. Finally, it is important to note that the dinner itself was good, despite the numerous service deficiencies. Conclusion: An overall disappointing experience due to a service clearly not up to the standards of a 2-star restaurant, despite quality cuisine."
Review rating: 4.0
Tripadvisor · Praise quote
"The food was very good. We had dinner before a show and were in and out so quickly that we had time to kill before the show. Jennifer was very attentive as were the other servers in the restaurant who assisted."
Review rating: 4.0
These snippets come from aggregated analysis text and highlight recurring language tied to this topic.
""Are we at Per Se or are we at Applebee's?" This was the question on our minds as we ate dinner. Buyer beware - do not come to Per Se if you are expecting a refined and elegant dining experience. Per Se has no expected standards of attire and behavior being enforced confirmed by its own maitre d Alex Pimentel. This failure of the purported three Michelin star institution greatly reduced the quality and enjoyment of our experience and was far below what we have experienced in the past at Per Se or other three Michelin star restaurants. One table in our direct view had two very old men with two teenaged-looking girls. One girl was wearing sweatpants, a crop top, and flip flops. The other girl was wearing a sweatshirt and sneakers. One of the old men had a little black puppy with him and Per Se allowed the puppy to run around the floor of the dining room throughout the dinner. Another table next to us was obnoxiously loud throughout the evening, taking over the space and taking away from everyone else's enjoyment. It was clear from the circus around us that Per Se has no standards for guest attire or behavior and does not care about guest experience at all. When I wrote to the restaurant after our dinner to share our feedback, the maitre d Alex Pimentel asked me to call him to talk. After playing phone tag a couple times, we were finally able to connect. Alex began the phone conversation by flippantly stating "I understand you had a problem with some guests who weren't dressed as nicely as you would have liked?" Wow. This is the guy they put in charge of guest relations? What a great attitude for the job. Alex ended up wasting 20 minutes of my time by making up excuses for every single aspect of our underwhelming dining experience. According to Alex: 1) Per Se does not have a dress code for women, only for men. Women can apparently dine in a string bikini and flip flops. Alex says: "Per Se gets people from all walks of life and unfortunately we really only enforce a dress code for men." 2) Alex said the old men were hotel guests and that they were dining with their "nieces or daughters." I told him that we could not care less where the old men were lodging or the nature of their relationship with the teenaged girls, but that the young women should at the very least not be wearing sweatpants, crop tops, flip flops, sweatshirts, and sneakers. Alex once again reiterated that there is no dress code for women. 3) Alex could not come up with an excuse for the puppy running around. 4) Alex said that if we were disappointed at any point in the evening with our experience, the burden was on us to try to create the experience we want. Alex said we should have complained about the other guests (all seated within earshot) and we may have been reseated space permitting. So a three Michelin star restaurant is putting the onus on its guests to create a fine dining experience. Why would it be on guests to make sure Per Se enforces basic standards of attire and behavior of other guests? When Per Se allows a circus in its dining room, Per Se is not going after a three Michelin star experience. When the maitre d tells guests that it is actually their burden and responsibility to create a pleasant and enjoyable experience, there is something terribly wrong with the training and culture at Per Se. 5) Food: lobster was extremely chewy like bubblegum. The chicken was bland and a bit rubbery. Loved the crispy skin on the bass. Lamb was just lamb, but on the tougher side. The wagyu was unremarkable. Black truffle pasta was delicious with a generous shaving of truffles. 6) Service: star is for Maris who was fantastic and we appreciated her excellent service and professionalism. Maris seemed to be the only one we encountered at Per Se who was aware that the restaurant is supposed to provide a three Michelin star experience. The wine pairing was $350 and the sommelier was perfunctory and inattentive. Alex concluded our phone conversation with an underwhelming, "well in the future please reach out to me to coordinate your next visit to Per Se." He didn't even offer a genuine apology without excuses or any gesture of good will from the restaurant. Will we be coming back to Per Se after this experience and Alex's response to our feedback? As Randy Jackson once eloquently stated, "Yeah that's gonna be a no from me, dawg.""
Signal: 0.0%
""Great once we got our table. One tip - if you’re asking people to wait for their table don’t stick them in a corridor where they’re in the way and can’t get a drink. It’s not the fault of paying customers that they’re on time but you’re not!""
Signal: 0.0%
"- Waited 15 minutes to have order taken after menu dropped off - Ordered cocktails, they never came, here's your first wine pairing and first course, I guess we just skipped them? - Missed bread course, waiter claimed it was intentionally skipped though hard to understand the rationale when everyone around us has it and there is literally a placeholder for a bread basket sitting on our table - Food served before wine pairing arrived (once) - Having to ask people dropping off food multiple times (is there a wine pairing? where are our cocktails? is there bread served?) and signaling waiters every 10 minutes = awkward experience The food was good, unfortunately it is not paired with the service is deserves."
Signal: 0.0%
""Service from hostess to wait staff and servers was excellent. My daughter has celiac disease. They were knowledgeable and helpful and even brought us a dessert… tiramisu to try because it was gluten free and the waiter was so proud. My daughter loved it and had never been able to try it before. I have been to the restaurant at least 10 times and I always love it… the food.. the service and ambience. All excellent"
Signal: 0.0%
"(Although disappointing to be sat 15 min late with a reservation), from then on my partner and I had an absolutely incredible meal. Our server Shannon had the most amazing vibes and service, and the food was 10/10 for every dish. We had an incredible time and are so appreciative of wonderful service and care for our Valentine’s Day dinner❤️"
Signal: 0.0%
"10 mins from Time Square is a very classy upmarket Mexican restaurant with fantastic value food….do not visit NYC without a visit Service was just outstanding from water to drinks to food White table cloths and subdued lighting make this a great place for special occasions but close to theatres if you are catching a show 2 very well behaved 10 year olds were enjoying it while I was there Live Mexican musicians performed for a short set The bill shocked me - very inexpensive for what we had ( for NYC ) Highly recommended by a local person - thank you!! Made my day…."
Signal: 0.0%
This interpretation highlights the largest deviations from the selected baseline so teams can prioritize faster.
Not enough comparison data is available for interpretation in this scope.
Check coverage and freshness before treating differences as operational priorities.
Reviews analyzed
9,623
Platforms covered
1
Last update
N/A
Move through these pages in order to validate findings and choose the next operational action.
Assign one owner per role so this topic moves from insight to action without ambiguity.
Business owner
Set one measurable target for this topic and review progress at fixed monthly checkpoints.
Operations manager
Define one process fix tied to this topic and review frontline adherence weekly.
Marketing lead
Align guest communication with your strongest signals, and address weak themes before promotional pushes.
Reviato emphasizes actionable comparisons over vanity averages so teams can execute with confidence.
Cross-platform discipline
We preserve platform context and compare like-with-like to avoid mixing structurally different review behaviors.
Validation workflow
Every insight should be validated in linked articles and source pages before operational rollout.
Review source articles behind this topic before choosing the next action.
TripAdvisor benchmark for New York Hotels: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
Google Maps benchmark for New York Hotels: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
TripAdvisor benchmark for New York Cafes: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
Google Maps benchmark for New York Cafes: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
TripAdvisor benchmark for Buffalo Restaurants: compare city rating and review volume against New York and US baselines with clear market-position context.
Google Maps benchmark for Buffalo Restaurants: compare city rating and review volume against New York and US baselines with clear market-position context.
TripAdvisor benchmark for New York restaurants vs New York Region and US on rating and review volume.
Google Maps benchmark for New York restaurants vs New York Region and US on rating and review volume.
This topic page shows the editorial owner, current evidence volume, and the latest aggregated refresh for the selected scope.
Use these links to validate the topic page against adjacent scope pages and the core methodology documents.
Editorial ownership
Review Intelligence Editorial Team
Reviato's insights team publishes review intelligence built from public platform data, market-level aggregation, and documented analysis standards.