Current scope
New York, United States
Topic
Detailed Amenities analysis for New York, United States.
This view focuses on Amenities signals in New York, United States to help you understand what guests mention most.
Use the linked insight articles to check examples, then prioritize one fix your team can execute this week.
This topic view covers multiple categories in United States. Narrow by category when you need operationally specific comparisons.
Start with the largest deviation, confirm confidence, then move through the guided journey to execute quickly.
Current scope
New York, United States
Largest gap
Baseline comparison is not available for this scope yet.
Confidence
66,079 reviews analyzed across 2 platforms.
Share of complaint snippets where this topic appears by platform.
This metric tracks topic presence in complaint snippets, not positive versus negative sentiment split.
Balance is praise minus complaint for this topic on the same platform.
Complaint signal
0.6%
Praise signal
0.7%
Complaint signal
0.9%
Praise signal
2.4%
Coverage
10 insight pages mention Amenities in this scope.
Signal strength
Complaint signal is 0.7% across available platforms.
Praise signal is 1.6% across available platforms.
Next step
Use these topic signals to prioritize one operational change, then check fresh reviews to confirm impact.
Use this global view as a baseline before drilling into country, region, or city-level topic patterns.
Amenities patterns usually point to operational choices that directly affect conversion and repeat visits for local businesses.
This section summarizes current complaint and praise signals for the selected scope and compares them to the available baseline.
Tripadvisor
Complaint signal is 0.9%.
Praise signal is 2.4%.
Google Maps
Complaint signal is 0.6%.
Praise signal is 0.7%.
These are the strongest recurring drivers behind this topic in the current scope.
Google Maps
Tripadvisor
Representative review excerpts add operational context to the topic signals.
Google Maps · Complaint quote
"I recently stayed at the New Yorker by Lotte Hotels for one night. Overall, I had a positive experience—the room was clean, the location is excellent, and the staff were friendly and professional. However, I was surprised by a “facility fee” (about $45.90 including tax) that was not clearly disclosed at the time of booking through Priceline. The total price shown did not include this fee, and no specific amount was provided in the booking details. At check-in, the fee was introduced in connection with amenities like Wi-Fi and business center access, which made it sound optional. I later learned that this is actually a mandatory charge applied to all guests. The receipt also does not clearly state that the fee is mandatory, which adds to the confusion. This lack of upfront price transparency made it difficult to understand the true total cost of the stay in advance. I would recommend the hotel clearly disclose all mandatory fees, including the exact amount, as part of the total booking price. Aside from this issue, the stay itself was enjoyable. I hope the hotel can improve transparency so future guests can make fully informed decisions."
Review rating: 3.0
Google Maps · Praise quote
"This hotel is good value in FIDI. The location is close to the major subway line stations and busses. The front desk service is professional and we were able to borrow an umbrella during rainy days. Room in general is fine. It's clean and has most of the basic amenities (except hair conditioner and lotion -- so be sure to bring that with you if you need it). The room size small as a typically NYC boutique hotel room, but it's enough space for two adults. It has a refrigerator, which is rare for NYC small value hotels. What can be improved is the stability of the shower water temperature and fixing the desk light that flickered. The room itself is very dark even with all the lights on (except desk light that was broken), so this is not a good place to do computer work if you're counting on that. If you are, then ask for a room with a working desk light. Some of the elevators were also down during our stay so that was a little annoying. The ones that worked were very slow, so plan accordingly if you're on a tight schedule."
Review rating: 4.0
Tripadvisor · Complaint quote
"Having flown from England to the US and then by train to the city, we were looking forward to getting to Our hotel on our very first night in NYC. Upon checking Claudia on Reception was unwelcoming. We mentioned that one of our party had a fear of heights and had pre requested a low room floor. Claudia said there was no note on the system and the best she could do was a 15th floor. Obviously all comms when making the booking were ignored When entering the room couple 1 found faeces in the toilet bowl and the shower which you needed to take a brisk run in order to get wet! The bed was broken and their heads were lower than their legs when trying to sleep. This coupled with a freezing cold room and the sounds of city cascading into the room felt like we were sleeping on the street. Couple 2’s room was very dated, chipped frames which had been badly painted over, dust on the tables, peeling wallpaper, condensation dripping down the windows and pooling on the windowsill. The bathroom was tiny with cheap outdated wooden sink cabinets that was peeling. There was one cheap Office chair at the desk/vanity unit. The shower controls were coming off the wall. Also no tea or coffee making facilities or complimentary water in the room. We were due to stay for 4 nights but after our first night we decided to book a different hotel at an additional cost. When we went to check out, we spoke to Claudia again on reception and said we were checking out early and she didn’t even ask why. I said don’t you even want to know why we are checking out early? She then listened briefly claiming she was make notes but she didn’t. Her response was “well it is due to be demolished” as if that made it acceptable When we pointed out she wasn’t making any notes she just walked off saying she was going to get a manager. Manager Will was very understanding and apologetic and took on board our complaint. I showed him photos I had taken also. However as we had booked through BA there wasn’t much he could do. This is at most a 2/3 star hotel. My recommendation is do not stay here. Even the doorman was apologetic when we said we were leaving."
Review rating: 1.0
Tripadvisor · Praise quote
"Great staff, excellent breakfast and very good Gym"
Review rating: 5.0
These snippets come from aggregated analysis text and highlight recurring language tied to this topic.
"$30 unannounced amenity fee. That’s a ripoff…"
Signal: 0.0%
"*Worst value in NYC* The rooms are small, very loud, and look like they’re from the ‘70’s. The room was $500 per night, see the photos below. The bathroom didn’t include any amenities, just soap. Staff were very friendly but value for the room is shocking, I would never recommend Sohotel."
Signal: 0.0%
"A 4-star hotel, really? Sorry, but 4-star hotels don't have obvious wear on the furniture and bathroom fittings. Having said that, this hotel is in a great location (right beside the World Trade Center and near to the Fulton St subway hub) and most importantly, the bed was comfy. Having the thermostat mounted beside the bed so you can adjust it without getting out of bed is a smart design choice too. The standout feature is the rooftop restaurant, which has an amazing view of the WTC Memorial and One World Trade from the balcony. This is accessible even in the colder months thanks to a canopy + heater setup. Would I stay here again? If the price was right, sure, you can do a lot worse. The bed was comfy, so if you just want a room to sleep in a central part of NYC and plan to spend the day on tourist activities, you could do a lot worse than here."
Signal: 0.0%
"retro charm with modern amenities."
Signal: 0.0%
"... my seven day solo vaca over xmas in NYC almost went south when I checked in at the Tillary. There was nothing wrong with the room, it just wasn't to my liking. Yoli (sp?) at the front desk cheerfully sent me to a different room that was much more to my liking. So much so that I booked the for the same dates next year. Since I'm an old Geezer when it comes to new technology, Emily at the front desk commandeered my phone and hooked me up with her best rate for next Christmas and threw in some nice amenities. The hotel is a rock solid structure in a great location - a minutes walk away from the Brooklyn Bridge gateway to Manhattan. And the staff was great - friendly and efficient. Go see."
Signal: 0.0%
"- Very well located hotel in the heart of Manhattan. - Apartment with little space, but with great bed and shower. - I stayed in an apartment with carpet. - TV from the '80s. - Elevators in excellent state of preservation. - Resort Fee: USD 40,16 (per day) + fee, which equals almost 45 collections per day. According to the hotel to use the internet, the gym, the business center and to connect between the apartments."
Signal: 0.0%
This interpretation highlights the largest deviations from the selected baseline so teams can prioritize faster.
Not enough comparison data is available for interpretation in this scope.
Check coverage and freshness before treating differences as operational priorities.
Reviews analyzed
66,079
Platforms covered
2
Last update
N/A
Move through these pages in order to validate findings and choose the next operational action.
Assign one owner per role so this topic moves from insight to action without ambiguity.
Business owner
Set one measurable target for this topic and review progress at fixed monthly checkpoints.
Operations manager
Define one process fix tied to this topic and review frontline adherence weekly.
Marketing lead
Align guest communication with your strongest signals, and address weak themes before promotional pushes.
Reviato emphasizes actionable comparisons over vanity averages so teams can execute with confidence.
Cross-platform discipline
We preserve platform context and compare like-with-like to avoid mixing structurally different review behaviors.
Validation workflow
Every insight should be validated in linked articles and source pages before operational rollout.
Review source articles behind this topic before choosing the next action.
TripAdvisor benchmark for New York Hotels: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
Google Maps benchmark for New York Hotels: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
TripAdvisor benchmark for New York Cafes: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
Google Maps benchmark for New York Cafes: compare city rating and review volume against New York Region and US baselines with clear market-position context.
TripAdvisor benchmark for Buffalo Restaurants: compare city rating and review volume against New York and US baselines with clear market-position context.
Google Maps benchmark for Buffalo Restaurants: compare city rating and review volume against New York and US baselines with clear market-position context.
TripAdvisor benchmark for New York restaurants vs New York Region and US on rating and review volume.
Google Maps benchmark for New York restaurants vs New York Region and US on rating and review volume.
This topic page shows the editorial owner, current evidence volume, and the latest aggregated refresh for the selected scope.
Use these links to validate the topic page against adjacent scope pages and the core methodology documents.
Editorial ownership
Review Intelligence Editorial Team
Reviato's insights team publishes review intelligence built from public platform data, market-level aggregation, and documented analysis standards.